Wednesday, February 10, 2010

Iran begins enriching higher-grade uranium, says state TV

Russia may back further UN sanctions after Tehran announces Natanz plant has begun production of 20% enriched uranium


Iran's Natanz uranium enrichment facility

A satellite image of Iran's Natanz uranium enrichment facility. Photograph: GeoEye/AP

Iran began enrichment of higher grade uranium today, state TV said, ignoring the threat of further UN sanctions by the US and its allies.

Iran's Arabic-language television channel, al-Alam, said production of 20% enriched uranium had started at the Natanz plant.

Ali Shirzadian, a spokesman for the country's Atomic Energy Organisation, told Reuters that "preparatory work" had began at 9:30am in presence of representatives from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).

The Iranian president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, said on Sunday that Iran would produce uranium enriched to a level of 20%. That announcement was greeted with alarm in the west and raised fears that Tehran wants to advance a nuclear weapons programme.

The US and France led calls for what would be a fourth, broader set of punitive UN security council sanctions. A senior politician in Russia, which in the past has urged talks rather than punishment, also said economic measures should be considered.

The Pentagon stepped up the pressure for sanctions saying it wanted measures in place "within weeks, not months". The remarks from Russia raise the prospect of China standing alone among the major powers in opposing sanctions against Iran.

Today China called for more talks and refused to comment on the prospect of economic measures. A foreign ministry spokesman, Ma Zhaoxu, said: "I hope the relevant parties will step up efforts and push for progress in the dialogue and negotiations."

Last night, the head of the Iran's atomic agency said it would not further increase the enrichment levels for the uranium if the west provides fuel for the reactor at the Tehran nuclear research centre.

"Whenever they provide the fuel, we will halt production of 20%," Ali Akbar Salehi told state TV,

The percentage measures of enrichment refer to concentration of the most fissile isotope, U-235 – which can sustain fission chain reaction. A weapon small enough to put on a missile would require uranium enriched to more than 90% U-235. Iran was previously enriching uranium to 3.5%.

The Islamic republic, which insists its nuclear programme is aimed at generating electricity, says it needs 20% fuel for the research reactor producing isotopes for medical use.

Ahmadinejad's announcement on Sunday came 48 hours after Iran's foreign minister, Manouchehr Mottaki, said a deal on exporting its uranium abroad to have it enriched was close to being finalised. An similar agreement last October to export its uranium rods to Franceeventually unravelled.

Coal and Treasuries

http://gregor.us/

It was the best of times for the developing world, and the worst of times for the developed world. In the developing world, they built savings. In the developed world, they groaned and sagged under the weight of debt. In a world where the credit of developed nations had always been believed, the serial monetizations and bailouts set loose an emerging incredulity–driving developing nations into gold, commodity currencies, and land. In the aftermath of the financial crisis the developing world, measured at about 4.5 billion people, lumbered forth with its insatiable demand for energy. Mostly coal. In the developed world? They replaced their lost demand, lost credit, and the loss of cheap energy the best they knew how: with paper.

OECD demand growth for oil faltered years ago, as far back as 2004 when oil went above the “unthinkable” price of 40 dollars a barrel. In the developing world the escalating price of oil did not so much delay, as divert, energy demand to the powergrid. To an extent that’s hard to measure, but certainly evidenced by power generation buildout and growth in electrified transport, the rising price of oil sent a confirmatory signal to the Non-OECD: stay on your coal trajectory. Of course, overall demand for all types of energy in the developing world took off ten years ago. Indeed, in 2008 for the first time ever, energy demand in the Non-OECD eclipsed by a hair all energy demand in the OECD. Roughly speaking, we can think of the OECD as the oil users, and the Non-OECD as the coal users. Gaze upon the chart below:

When the developing world faced higher oil prices, it guided its development toward power generation. But when the developed world, already married to an oil based infrastructure, faced higher oil prices it guided its development towards growth in credit. The United States is the number 2 user of coal, behind China, at 565 mtoe per year. And Germany is the number 7 user of coal at 85 mtoe per year. But coal demand growth in the OECD is largely halted by infrastructure. Most of the powergen additions in the OECD the past 30 years have been natural gas fired. Take a look at the growth of coal demand over the past 20 years, meanwhile, back in the developing world.

While the United States has little room for growth in coal demand, it does indeed have room to reduce coal demand as the depression rolls onward. It should not have been a surprise to anyone following the latest failed recovery in the housing market, the continued crash in the commercial real estate market, and the predictable fall-offs in auto production (since cash for clunkers) that US electricity demand is going nowhere. Thus, when CSX Railroad announced last week that shipments of coal to US utilities would not be strong this year it was confirmatory to the macro trend. Although natural gas is “more expensive” on a per unit basis, it generally takes a much bigger spread to get utilities to actually favor coal over natural gas as the latter can be burnt with lower regulatory costs.

The expansion of the FED’s balance sheet and the explosion in government debt issuance, therefore, may have eased the pain of the US industrial and consumer collapse–but they’ve done nothing to revive real demand. And the coming tail-off in electricity use even from low levels is yet another sign that the 2009 stimulus package as well did not come back to Washington in the form of higher industrial activity–and higher tax receipts. Indeed, tax receipts on both the state and federal level are awful and this accounts for recent declarations from Illinois, New York, and California that they are essentially broke. In all that empty commercial real estate across the country, where no shoppers roam and no sales tax is recorded, the thermostats are turned down and the lights are turned off.

Meanwhile, there is every indication that the FED is going to have to extend its quantitative easing as the supply of Treasuries continues to ramp higher while US savings and international capital flows are simply not enough to supply the necessary bid, in US Treasuries. Moreover, it’s likely that a great deal of last year’s bid in US Treasuries was simply the FED’s monetization of the mortgage-backed securities market (MBS) coming back in the form of Treasury demand. The FED in a program of ongoing duration started purchasing 1.3 trillion of MBS starting last year, with the intent to continue through the end of March 2010. Should they not extend the MBS purchase program, I would expect Treasury prices to fall. Foreigners have already been avoiding the longer end of the bond curve, or simply reducing Treasury purchases overall. | see: Debt Burden Now Rests More on US Shoulders. Additionally, there is the problem of duration, in that Treasury has been funding a large portion of US deficit spending with shorter duration bonds. That means a larger number of bonds mature in shorter timeframes. Thus, in 2010, the US not only has to float a large new supply of Treasuries but it has to find buyers for its maturing supply of Treasuries. | see: The $700 Billion U.S. Funding Hole; Desperately Seeking A Very Indiscriminate Treasury Buyer.

Surprisingly, or perhaps perversely, 2010 sees an accelerated continuation of the 10 year trend in developing world coal demand and developed world credit growth. For all of its reflationary firepower, the OECD has at best eased the acute phase of deflation while sparking strong inflation in the Non-OECD. Here in the developed world we continue to see asset price deflation in real estate, though notably, our purchasing power has started to fall in the aggregate in both the US and in Britain. (In China, inflation threatens to rage. ) The problem for the OECD is that energy demand in the Non OECD does not translate well to demand growth for US Treasuries or UK Gilts. Coal prices are strong however because US utilities may not require more coal but pan-Asian utilities continue to build capacity, and the trajectory higher continues.

In January 2009 I asserted that the 27 year bull market in US Treasuries had ended in the blow off panic spike (in prices) just that December. I maintain that view now. And, while Washington may at times entertain thoughts of choosing a deflationary pathway out of the crisis–call it aliquidationist urge, if you will–the voices that beckon to inflate our way out of the crisis will always win out out in the end.

The developing world is clear-eyed enough to know that it cannot depend on developed world demand, to keep its factories running. This is why alot of direct trade occurs now within the Non-OECD that is designed to both trigger domestic demand and which also facilitates resource for resource deals which lock up supply. It’s in the developed world however that the lack of sobriety has reached epidemic levels as we keep trying to replace both energy inputs and production–with credit. When the growth in private credit could no longer carry the weight and failed, we embarked on a mad dash to do the same with sovereign credit. Were the OECD and especially the United States building new power generation or electrified transport with this credit, we could at least expect to get some return on the investment. But alas, we are hellbent still in trying to revive consumer demand. Thus, for all the growth in government debt, we are doing nothing more but pouring water on concrete.

-Gregor

charts by www.gregor.us using data from BP Statistical Review 2009

PTT's floating depot could fend off LPG shortage

State ministries are collaborating to ease regulations on ship-to-ship transfer of liquefied petroleum gas to help prevent a shortage of the fuel nationwide.

PTT rents out the floating unit, which can store 50,000 tonnes of gas, for 1 million baht a day.

The Energy, Finance and Transport ministries are working with PTT, Thailand's sole LPG importer to facilitate offshore transfers.

All imported petroleum products must now be transferred from transport ships to onshore storage for tax purposes, said Energy Minister Wannarat Channukul.

PTT, after collaborating with the Finance and Transport ministries, recently received an operating licence for its LPG floating storage unit in Chon Buri - Thailand's only facility for ship-to-ship transfer of petroleum products.

In recent years Thailand has suffered cooking-gas shortages, in part as surging oil prices led motorists to use the fuel for vehicles.

"We don't have enough time to expand the capacity of current LPG storage facilities to serve the huge jump in cooking gas demand," said Mr Wannarat.

"[Using ship-to-ship transfer] we can import more LPG to serve the [increasing demand from] motorists."

PTT rents out the floating unit, which can store 50,000 tonnes of gas, for 1 million baht a day, a cheaper option than investing itself.

The firm has spent 135 million baht on upgrading its onshore LPG cooking gas depot and expanding its storage capacity to 88,000 tonnes per month from 60,000 tonnes. PTT's total LPG storage capacity is about 135,000 tonnes a month.

PTT forecasts demand will rise to 120,000 to 170,000 tonnes per month.

The Energy Ministry forecasts demand for cooking gas at 5.4 million tonnes a year - domestic capacity of 3.7 million tonnes and imports of 1.4 million tonnes.

The Map Ta Phut dispute has raised fears of a gas shortage from the suspension a PTT gas separation plant with an LPG capacity of 1 million tonnes a year.

Letting PTT operate its new plant would ease fears of a shortage and cut import-related losses, said Mr Wannarat.

The Map Ta Phut impasse began in September when a court suspended 76 projects in the area over constitutional health and environment requirements. Some 65 projects are still suspended.

Shares of PTT closed on the SET at 224 baht, up one baht, in trade worth 1 billion baht.

Pan Orient Energy Corp.: Thailand Operations Update

CALGARY, ALBERTA--(Marketwire - Feb. 9, 2010) - Pan Orient Energy Corp. (TSX VENTURE:POE) -

Thailand L53 Concession

L53-DST1 Appraisal Well (100% WI and operator)

The L53-DST1 appraisal well was drilled to a subsurface location approximately 270 meters northwest of the L53-D exploration well targeting a sandstone reservoir that tested at a restricted rate of 228 barrels of 19 degree API crude oil and 74 barrels of water per day.

The main reservoir objective was encountered as expected but proved to be very low permeability in the upper portion upon production test and water bearing at the base.

There are currently no reserves booked for the L53-D structure. Results to date are far below pre-drill expectations with regard to oil bearing reservoir thickness and areal extent.

Thailand L44 Concession

NSE-G3 Exploration Well (60% WI and operator)

The NSE-G3 exploration well is currently suspended at the casing shoe just below the base of the main NSE central producing volcanic. The deeper volcanic objective in the well was penetrated approximately 175 meters (true vertical depth) deeper than originally anticipated due to a large fault not imaged by 3D seismic data over the prospect as a result of interference from the shallower volcanic objective.

Reinterpretation of the data integrating the well results suggests only a small portion of the original prospect closure is eliminated by this fault. Upon the completion development drilling program currently underway, the well will be re-entered and sidetracked in order to test this deep volcanic objective in an optimal position.

Summary

For the next three months Pan Orient plans to focus exclusively on development and appraisal drilling of the Bo Rang B, NSE-F1, NSE Central, Na Sanun and NSE South oilfields and workovers / recompletions of existing wells in the NSE Central field in order to increase oil production from these assets. Regular updates on these activities will be provided as results warrant.

An updated exploration prospect inventory for Concessions L44, L33 and L53 integrating all the well results to date is near completion and will form the basis for high grading locations for an active exploration drilling program that is planned to commence upon the completion of this current phase of development and appraisal drilling.

Pan Orient is a Calgary, Alberta based oil and gas exploration and production company with operations currently located onshore Thailand, Indonesia and in Western Canada.

Foster Wheeler to Supply Condensers to Lilama for Thermal Power Plant in Vietnam

ZUG, Switzerland, Feb 09, 2010 (BUSINESS WIRE) -- Foster Wheeler AG (FWLT 26.30, +0.28, +1.08%)announced today that a subsidiary of its Global Power Group has been awarded a contract by Lilama Corporation, a Vietnamese EPC contractor, for the design and supply of two steam surface condensers and auxiliary equipment for the Vung Ang Thermal Power Plant in Vietnam.

The 2 x 600 MWe coal-fired power plant will be located in Ha Tinh Province on the north central coast of Vietnam. The project is being built by investments from the Vietnam National Oil and Gas Group (PetroVietnam) as part of the National Power Development Plan for the 2006-2015 period.

Foster Wheeler has received a full notice to proceed on this contract. The terms of the agreement were not disclosed, and the contract value will be included in the company's first-quarter 2010 bookings. Commercial operation of the first unit is scheduled for the second quarter of 2012 with the second unit coming online in the first quarter of 2013.

"We are proud to be awarded this opportunity to work with Lilama for this important project," said Gary Nedelka, president and chief executive officer of Foster Wheeler Global Power Group. "Lilama is a leading EPC contractor in Vietnam serving the power industry and we believe this project will be the beginning of a successful relationship between our companies in providing high quality equipment to meet the needs of the rapidly expanding Vietnamese power sector."

"Lilama and Foster Wheeler have had a long-standing relationship and we are pleased to have Foster Wheeler supply the condensers for the Vung Ang Project," said Pham Hung, chief executive officer of Lilama Corporation. "Foster Wheeler is a global company with world-class technologies and we look forward to future cooperation between our two companies in serving the growing Vietnam power market."

Foster Wheeler AG is a global engineering and construction contractor and power equipment supplier delivering technically advanced, reliable facilities and equipment. The company employs approximately 14,000 talented professionals with specialized expertise dedicated to serving its clients through one of its two primary business groups. The company's Global Engineering and Construction Group designs and constructs leading-edge processing facilities for the upstream oil and gas, LNG and gas-to-liquids, refining, chemicals and petrochemicals, power, environmental, pharmaceuticals, biotechnology and healthcare industries. The company's Global Power Group is a world leader in combustion and steam generation technology that designs, manufactures and erects steam generating and auxiliary equipment for power stations and industrial facilities and also provides a wide range of aftermarket services. The company is based in Zug, Switzerland. For more information about Foster Wheeler, please visit our Web site at www.fwc.com.

CNOOC: Partner Husky finds gas field in S.China Sea

BEIJING: China National Offshore Oil Company Limited (CNOOC Ltd.) announced Tuesday its partner, Husky Oil China Limited, a subsidiary of Husky Energy Inc., has discovered a new deepwater gas field in the South China Sea.

The LiuHua (LH) 29-1 field is the third deepwater gas discovery made in Block 29/26 of the Pearl River Mouth Basin in the eastern South China Sea, after other discoveries in 2006 and 2009, CNOOC said in a statement on its website.

The well, drilled to a total depth of 3,331 meters with a water depth of about 720 meters, was tested to flow 57 million cubic feet (1.61 million cubic meters) of natural gas per day.

Related readings:
CNOOC: Partner Husky finds gas field in S.China Sea CNOOC shares fall on news of purchase
CNOOC: Partner Husky finds gas field in S.China Sea CNOOC Uganda deal likely to quiet critics
CNOOC: Partner Husky finds gas field in S.China Sea CNOOC to boost oil output to 290m barrels in 2010
CNOOC: Partner Husky finds gas field in S.China Sea South China Sea gas find to fuel CNOOC dreams

Zhu Weilin, executive vice president of the CNOOC Ltd. and general manager of exploration department, said the deepwater area is one of the major exploration efforts for CNOOC Ltd. in 2010.

The LH 29-1 field will be further appraised in 2010 by Canada-based Husky, which signed a production sharing agreement for Block 29/26 with CNOOC Ltd. in 2004.

According to the contract, CNOOC Ltd. has the right to hold up to 51 percent interest in any commercial discoveries in Block 29/26.

CNOOC Ltd. is the listed subsidiary of China National Offshore Oil Corporation, China's largest offshore oil company.

China's CNOOC to buy stake in oil assets in Uganda for US$2.5 bln

Feb. 9, 2010 (China Knowledge) - China National Offshore Oil Corp, which is the largest offshore oil company in the country and is also known as CNOOC, has agreed to spend US$2.5 billion to buy some of Tullow Oil Plc's oil assets in Uganda, Dow Jones Newswires reported on Friday, citing sources familiar with the matter as saying.

The parties are expected to sign an agreement soon. The deal will enable CNOOC to join Tullow Oil Plc in exploring Uganda's large oil deposits.

Reportedly, Tullow Oil, one of the largest independent oil and gas exploration and production companies in Europe, presented Uganda with the choice of CNOOC and France's Total as potential investors in Block 1 and Block 3A in the African country.

The Chinese oil company and Tullow plan to invest a total of US$5 billion to build a refinery and a 1,300-km oil pipeline for the project, according to an earlier report from China Knowledge.

The deal will be the first investment by a Chinese oil company in Uganda.

FACTBOX-China's sites for commercial oil storage

(Updates with CNPC's Tianjin crude tanks)

 BEIJING, Feb 9 (Reuters) - China National Petroleum Corp (CNPC) will start building a 6.2 million-barrel crude-oil tank farm next month in the northern port of Tianjin, which it aims to complete by end of this year, state media said.
 The move is the latest in the country's storage building boom, led by state refiner Sinopec Corp (0386.HK)(600028.SS) and PetroChina (0857.HK)(601857.SS), listed arm of CNPC, to service their expanding refining systems.
 China rarely publishes storage data for state oil companies, but one logistics executive with a state-run firm last April put the total crude tank space at 40 million cu.m (252 million barrels) and products at 50 million cu.m (315 million barrels).
 A senior PetroChina official said China's total refined oil products storage capacity hit 52 million cu.m (327.6 million barrels) at the end of 2008, growing by an average annual rate of 9 percent from 40 million cu.m in 2004.
 The official also estimated that Chinese oil firms would expand their products tanks to 70 million cu.m (441 million barrels) by 2015.
 By 2015, the top two oil firms' refined products capacity is likely to exceed 40 million cu.m (252 million barrels) from the current level of 27.68 million cu.m while private firms' capacity is to hit 28 million cu.m (176.4 million barrels) from the existing 24.36 million cu.m, the official said.
 State oil trader Sinochem Corp plans to add 2.5 million barrels of depots in the southern city of Zhuhai by 2010, to store fuel oil and products, industry website C1 has reported.
 China's private investors are also joining a rapidly expanding oil storage business long driven by state oil companies, lured by hopes of market opening and Beijing's call to boost reserves.
 From blanket makers to auto parts manufacturers, scores of private entrepreneurs have since 2008 been erecting depots along the coast from Dalian in the north to Shenzhen in the south, inspired by Beijing's plan to build oil reserves.
 But analysts warned the building frenzy by the private sector, which focuses on refined fuel tanks, could leave many tanks idle.
 China's independent oil firms -- wholesalers and small refineries -- already claim to run a total of 250 million cubic metres of space in tanks, most of which store fuels instead of crude oil, said Zhao Youshan, head of the China Fuel Distribution Association.
 Following is a glimpse of commercial storage facilities in use and those being built or planned, according to Chinese media reports and industry officials.
 The data does not cover China's strategic crude reserve. For a factbox of China's strategic reserve, click [ID:nPEK162917]
 (capacity in cubic metres) ----------------------------------------------------------------   Facility     Location    Capacity   Builder          Stockpile ----------------------------------------------------------------   Aoshan       Zhejiang   1,960,000   Sinochem         crude/fuel CezidaoI     Zhejiang     600,000   Sinopec          crude CezidaoII    Zhejiang     200,000   Sinopec          crude Daxiedao     Zhejiang     830,000   Sinopec          crude Huangdao     Shandong   2,100,000   Sinopec          crude/fuel Zhanjiang    Guangdong    860,000   Sinopec          N/A Zhanjiang    Guangdong  1,950,000   PetroChina       crude/fuel Dalian       Shandong   1,750,000   PetroChina       crude Caofeidian   Hebei        800,000   Sinopec          crude Hengxin      Zhejiang     370,000   Daxie Hengxin     all
   Qingzhi      Zhejiang     150,000   Ningbo Haineng   fuel/chem Ganghong     Zhejiang     190,000   Sinopec          fuel/chem CengangI     Zhejiang     134,000   Zhejiang Haihua  fuel CengangII    Zhejiang     256,000   Zhejiang Haihua   fuel Dongfang     Shanghai     223,500   Sinochem           all YangshanI    Zhejiang     420,000   PetroChina fuel   fuel     Haibin       Shanghai     300,000   PTR/Chimbusco     fuel Nantong      Jiangsu      238,000   Sinochem           all Nantong      Jiangsu      210,000   Dongfang Shihua    all Yanghong     Jiangsu      223,000   Yanghong Shihua   fuel/chem Jiamin       Jiangsu      156,000   Jiamin Gangchu    fuel/chem BaishawanI   Shanghai     800,000   Sinopec           crude BaishawanII  Shanghai     600,000   Sinopec           crude Guanghui     Shenzhen     400,000   Brightway         fuel Shanshan     Xinjiang   1,000,000   PetroChina    crude (Dec 08) Zhenhai      Zhejiang   3,800,000   Sinopec       crude (Dec 08) Huizhou      Guangdong  1,000,000   CNOOC            crude     Huizhou      Guangdong    300,000   PetroChina       crude     Nansha       Guangdong    400,000   PetroChina        N/A     ----------------------------------------------------------------   Tanks Under Construction or planned: ----------------------------------------------------------------   Facility     Location   Capacity  Builder    Stockpile Start-up ----------------------------------------------------------------   GaolangangII Zhuhai      460,000  PetroChina  fuel          N/A YangshanII   Zhejiang  2,280,000  PetroChina  fuel          N/A Pengzhou     Sichuan   1,000,000  PetroChina  crude         N/A Xiaohudao    Guangdong   765,000  PetroChina  fuel         2009 Daxie        Zhejiang  1,300,000  PetroChina  crude/fuel
 Oct WangjiagouI  Xinjiang    150,000  PetroChina  crude
  Oct GaolangangI  Zhuhai      540,000  PetroChina  fuel     Mar 2010 Daqing       Daqing    1,500,000  PetroChina  crude
   2010 WangjiagouII Xinjiang    300,000  PetroChina  crude
    2010 Lanzhou      Gansu     2,000,000  PetroChina  crude
     2011 Tianjin      Tianjin   1,000,000  CNPC       crude
 end 2010 Rizhao       Shandong  2,400,000  Sinopec    crude          N/A Yangzhou     Jiangsu     236,000  Sinochem   fuel/chem      May Gaolangang   Zhuhai      410,000  Sinochem
fuel          2010 Chuanshan    Zhejiang    196,000  Gangxin
 fuel oil       N/A Wanxiang     Zhejiang    570,000 Wanxiang    fuel           N/A Jinrun       Zhejiang    500,000  Jinrun      fuel       2009/10 Xixiezhi     Zhejiang   250,000  Jianqiao    fuel          2009 Taipingyang  Zhejiang   400,000  ZS CPCC^    fuel/chem    09'Q3 Bailian      Shanghai   200,000  RL Pudong   fuel         09'Q3 Guanghui     Shenzhen
600,000  Brightway   fuel          2010 GuanghuiI   Shanghai
140,000  Brightway   fuel          2010 GuanghuiII  Shanghai    160,000  Brightway   fuel          2011 Yangpu      Hainan    5,000,000  Vopak/China crude/fuel    2011 ----------------------------------------------------------------   TOTAL                22,357,000  ^Zhoushan Century Pacific Chemicals Co., Ltd  * builders other than Sinopec, PetroChina, Sinochem or CNOOC are independents  (Editing by Ken Wills)

Tuesday, February 9, 2010

LOANS: Leader Infrastructure Closes US$140m PF facility

Bookrunner and lead co-ordinator OCBC (Malaysia) has closed a US$140m seven-year project finance loan for Leader Infrastructure, a Labuan-based SPV that is fully owned by Malaysia-listed Leader Universal Holdings.

Proceeds will be used to set up a 100mw power plant in Cambodia where the borrower already has a 35mw plant. The facility has a two-year extension option and pays about 300bp all-in over the lenders’ cost of funds.

OCBC committed US$60m, while Maybank participating as joint mandated lead arranger took US$50m. Lead managers Ambank and Bank of China came in with US$20m and US$10m tickets respectively. The facility has full recourse to the Malaysian parent and will be signed next week.

Oil Prices Fall Sharply as General Market Sells Off

Oil Market Summary for 02/01/2010 to 02/05/2010

After starting the week on a firmer note, oil prices fell sharply toward the end of the week in a general market sell-off as investors sought the dollar as a safe haven amid worries about European Union economies.

Debt problems that have plagued Greece are now spreading to Portugal and Spain, driving the euro down temporarily below $1.36 and bringing the dollar to an 8-month high. Because oil and other commodities are priced in dollars, gains in the U.S. currency usually translate into declines in oil prices.

Even a decline in the U.S. jobless rate below 10% on Friday could not stop the downward trend in commodities.

Some analysts were predicting that crude oil futures, which crashed through the longtime support level of $72 dollars a barrel to dip briefly below $70 for West Texas Intermediate in Friday afternoon trading, were sliding downward into a new trading range of $65 to $72 a barrel, after oscillating between $72 and $80 the past several weeks. Crude oil, which settled just above $71 a barrel on Friday, has dropped nearly 15% since hitting its 15-month high just above $83 on Jan. 6.

Energy news also depressed prices. Crude oil inventories in the U.S. rose 2.3 million barrels in the week, several times what economists had been expecting. In Asia, China is importing more crude than it needs, analysts said, apparently with intention of exporting more refined products, which would weigh on the global market.

Earlier in the week, positive manufacturing data from several economies had driven up energy prices to above $77 a barrel as market participants saw signs of stronger economic recovery. But that gave way to the concerns about a debt contagion in Europe and the impact of austerity measures to bring debt under control.

The new scramble into the dollar as a safe haven was evident in the sharp drop in gold prices, which fell more than 4% on Thursday, and fell further on Friday to about $1,050 an ounce. Gold had risen in the past few months as a safe haven from the dollar.

Now cash – dollar cash – seems to be the preferred safe haven for many investors. The Dow Jones Industrial Average, which spent most of the day well below 10,000, recovered in a late rally to close above that threshold with a small gain.

By Darrell Delamaide for OilPrice.com who focus on Fossil Fuels, Alternative Energy, Metals, http://www.oilprice.com" target="new">Crude Oil Price and Geopolitics To find out more visit their website at: http://www.oilprice.com

China named for Iranian pipeline role

ISLAMABAD, Pakistan, Feb. 8 (UPI) -- Pakistani officials said they would welcome China to a planned natural gas pipeline from Iran's South Pars as the role for India fades, Tehran said.

Iran is eager to deliver gas from its giant South Pars field through a long-delayed pipeline to eastern markets. Tehran and Islamabad agreed on a comprehensive deal for the pipeline in 2009.

Pakistan, faced with a looming energy crisis, is slated for 750 million cubic feet of natural gas per day from the South Pars gas field in Iran as part of a 25-year deal for the proposed pipeline.

India was intended as a partner in the project, though its interest has waned. Islamabad said Tehran should not ask Islamabad to guarantee the supply of natural gas to India because of the stormy relationship between the two countries.

Manouchehr Mottaki, the Iranian foreign minister, said most in Pakistan viewed a Chinese role in the project as beneficial if India formally backs out, the official Islamic Republic News Agency reports.

Tehran said in January that it saw Russian gas monopoly Gazprom as a possible partner in the long-delayed pipeline as well.

Ankara is expected to host Iranian and Pakistani officials for a signing ceremony on the pipeline before the weekend.

Think about the doubling concept, and the huge growth in OTC derivatives plus the budget deficit

Dubai announces offshore oil discovery

Eric Watkins
OGJ Oil Diplomacy Editor

LOS ANGELES, Feb. 8 -- Dubai’s ruler Sheikh Mohammed bin Rashid Al Maktoum announced an oil discovery east of Rashid field 70 km offshore in the Persian Gulf (see map, OGJ, Nov. 5, 2007, p. 66).

He made no comment about size of the discovery but instructed Dubai’s oil affairs department to “begin exploration work and conduct needed research to specify the size of the reserve and its production capacity in the short and long term.”

Analyst IHS Global Insight said the discovery is “an interesting and encouraging event, although it is unlikely to be very large.”

Regardless of its size, Sheikh Mohammed, who is also the United Arab Emirates vice-president and prime minister, hoped the discovery would “give a strong boost to all sectors of the local economy and provide a new source of revenue that could strengthen the drive for comprehensive development in Dubai.”

The find comes at a welcome time for Dubai’s economy, which has been hard-hit by the worldwide economic crisis.

Iran Tankers Idle in Persian Gulf as Oil Declines Before OPEC

By Alaric Nightingale

Feb. 9 (Bloomberg) -- Iran, OPEC’s second-largest crude producer, has at least three supertankers idling in the Persian Gulf, as oil prices decline five weeks before the group’s next meeting, vessel-tracking data show.

The tankers, each bigger than the Chrysler Building, have been almost stationary for at least four weeks, according to data from the ships collected by AIS Live Ltd. The depth of the 2-million-barrel vessels sitting in the water indicates they are loaded. The amount of oil stored may expand because signals from two more idled tankers shows they are partially loaded or empty.

The Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries, accounting for about 40 percent of global supply, meets March 17 in Vienna to discuss production quotas after raising output in eight of the last 10 months. Two years ago, Iran used as many as 14 tankers to store oil when purchases by refiners declined.

“We are entering the season when there should be some low demand from Japan, which is a big user of Iranian crude,” Olivier Jakob, managing director of Zug, Switzerland-based oil consultant Petromatrix GmbH, said by phone. “When you have some floating storage, from Iran or from pure traders, it always adds a bit to the feeling there’s spare capacity available.”

Seifollah Jashnsaz, managing director of the National Iranian Oil Co., and the company’s manager of international affairs, Ali Asghar Arshi, didn’t immediately respond to phone calls. Deputy Oil Minister Hossein Noghrekar Shirazi declined to comment. Mohammad Ali Khatibi, Iran’s OPEC governor, referred calls to NIOC because he isn’t responsible for oil marketing.


Cushing, Oklahoma


If full, the three tankers’ combined capacity of about 6 million barrels is equal to 19 percent of all the crude the U.S. Energy Department estimates is stored in Cushing, Oklahoma, the pricing point for benchmark West Texas Intermediate oil.

The 1,100-foot Haraz has floated off the United Arab Emirates since Jan. 2 and the Huwayzeh arrived in the same area Jan. 10. The Najm has been near Iran since Jan. 4, according to the data from AIS Live, owned by Lloyd’s Register-Fairplay. Two other ships are in the area and may have partial loads or be preparing to store. The Dadgar has been near Iran since Jan. 1 and the Honar arrived in the area on Jan. 21.

Other Iranian tankers are also idled. The Nesa has been off Malta since December and the Davar off Benin in West Africa since November. The ships’ drafts indicate they’re both loaded. As well as being used for Iranian crude, the vessels are also leased out.


Crude Weakens


Crude prices have fallen for four weeks, the longest losing streak since July, on concern that European efforts to reduce budget deficits will curb growth just as their economies start to rebound. A faltering recovery may bolster the U.S. dollar and prompt the sale of commodities. Oil for March delivery traded at $71.66 a barrel on the New York Mercantile Exchange yesterday, 10 percent lower than at the start of the year.

Crude rose 82 percent in the last 12 months and the International Energy Agency expects global demand to expand 1.7 percent this year, after two annual contractions.

As Iran’s cargoes sit, oil companies and banks are selling crude stored on tankers into the market. The number of ships involved in the “contango” trade, named after the term used to describe a market where future commodity prices are higher than today, declined 16 percent last month, according to data from London-based E.A. Gibson Shipbrokers Ltd. The amount of crude tied up in storage fell 25 percent last week, Morgan Stanley said in a Feb. 7 report.


Crude-Oil Spread


The trade makes money as long as the difference between energy contracts exceeds the costs of ship rental, insurance and financing. A year ago, the spread between the first and sixth Brent crude-oil contracts traded on the London-based ICE Futures Europe exchange was 12 percent. It’s now 4 percent. The return of stored cargoes suggests the trade is less profitable and traders anticipate a further narrowing of the spread.

Iran may have a surplus of high-sulfur crude as refineries that process the fuel prepare to shut down for maintenance. The discount on Iran Heavy crude compared with Oman and Dubai petroleum widened to 65 cents a barrel, from 41 cents at the end of last year, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. World oil supply is sufficient to meet demand during the first half of this year, Iran’s OPEC governor, Khatibi, said yesterday.

Storing crude on tankers ties up vessels and bolsters rental rates. Iran’s storage in 2008 contributed to a tripling in the cost of chartering supertankers. Daily charter rates on the Saudi Arabia-to-Japan route, the industry’s benchmark, advanced 5.3 percent to $42,349 this year. Frontline Ltd., the world’s biggest operator of the vessels, needs $32,900 a day to break even.



--With assistance from Ali Sheikholeslami in London and Ayesha Daya in Dubai. Editors: Stuart Wallace, Tim Coulter

Sovereign Risk and the Price of Oil

By Economic Forecasts & Opinions

European and U.S. stock markets have taken a hit recently as spooked investors from Shanghai to Sao Paolo were fleeing risky assets amid concern that the financial crisis in Portugal and Greece could spread through the euro zone with vast implications for the fate of the fragile global economic recovery. (Fig. 1)


Liquidate & Buy Dollar

A steep drop in crude-oil prices triggered declines across the commodities spectrum, as investors nervous about the pace of the economic recovery gravitated back to the dollar. Crude oil tumbled to a seven-week low of $71.19 a barrel last Friday, down 14% since the 2010 high of $83.18 reached on Jan. 6.

Investors’ fled for safety drove the U.S. dollar near a nine-month high against the euro. Emerging market currencies also weakened in Asia, while U.S. stocks fell a fourth straight week, the longest streak since July.

A Shift of Sovereign Risk

According to EPFR Global, risk aversion has prompted a withdrawal of $1.6 billion from emerging market equity funds during the week ending Feb. 3, the biggest outflows in 24 weeks, and $516 million has left Asian equities outside of Japan.

The charts from CDR (Credit Derivatives Research) tell the story of this investors’ perception. According to CDR, there has been a dramatic shift of risk in developed nations relative to emerging and less-developed nations when comparing three sovereign risk indexes, SovV, EM and CEEMEA. (Fig. 2)


In SovX, the GIPSI (H/T Zero Hedge) - Greece, Italy, Portugal, Spain and Ireland, represent around 65% of the index risk. In EM, Venezuela accounts for 26%, Turkey, Brazil, and Argentina represents 12% respectively of the EM risk. In CEEMEA, Turkey and Russia represent 49% of the index risk (followed by Hungary and Ukraine each at over 8%).

In addition, CDR finds that the sovereign risks of the emerging economies appear to be closely tied to the price of oil:

“It would appear that the CEEMEA and EM sovereign risk indices are threatened more by commodity price pressures than credit risk currently - and given the 'relatively' high price of oil/gas, their risk remains less of a concern than developed nations where the Ponzi appears to be in question.” (Fig. 3)

Oil Price - A Key Risk Factor

Emerging market countries, such as Brazil, China or India, are evolving since the early 90s. During this period, the issuance of bonds by these countries has increased significantly reflecting their needs for substantial long term and infrastructure investment.

Among the many determinants of risk bonds, the price of oil is a key factor as it plays a significant role in economic growth, inflation, production costs, trade balances and currency. Nine of the 10 economic recessions in the United States since the end of World War II were preceded by a dramatic increase in the price of oil.

A Sensitivity Issue

Oil prices nowadays are extremely volatile, and sharp fluctuations in oil prices contribute to macroeconomic volatility all over the globe. The impact of this volatility on economy varies according to a country’s relative dependence on oil production and exports.

For oil-exporting countries like Russia and Saudi Arabia, a rise in oil prices caused a perception of risk reduction relative to its obligations. Conversely, an oil-importing country sees its risk index increase due to a barrel price shock.

Financial Crisis 2.0?

Last week's wild commodity price swings underscore how investors aren't totally convinced that the world economy is on an upward trajectory. Investors are worried that multi-governments' debt problems will spread globally similar to the subprime crisis in 2008.

In addition to concerns about GIPSI sovereign debt defaults in the 16-nation euro zone, the U.S. is grappling with its own deficits and the high jobless rate, while China began restricting lending last month to prevent high inflation.

Some analysts expect global commodity prices would eventually firm up reflecting economic recovery albeit high volatility; and fundamentals should increasingly dominate expectations and drive prices.

But there are others see the current “correction” as caused by factors very similar those brought on the “financial crisis of 2007-2010” and warned this could signal “a new crisis in development.”

Seeking Negative Beta

In this environment, a defensive play would be to invest or allocate a portion in regions that are less prone to the price of oil, which is a significant sovereign risk factor. Sector wise,agriculture and alternative investment vehicles in real estateor land development should provide some good diversification to any long term portfolios.

Jeff Rubin, Chief Economist at CIBC World Markets pointed out that the United States is less sensitive to oil price volatilities because it is itself an oil producer (5 million barrels out of 19 million barrels the US consumes are produced in the US), so it receives some of the benefit of both higher and lower oil prices. An IEA analysis also indicated that the U.S. should be less affected by oil price shocks than Japan, OECD and Euro zone. (Fig. 4)


This competitive edge probably partly explains how investors still see the U.S. dollar as a safe haven, and Mr. Geithner's optimism that more debt won't hurt U.S. credit rating, in spite of the fiscal and economic challenges quite similar to what the Euro Zone is facing.

BRIC minus R

In addition to the United State, GDP growth in Brazil, China and India could get boost from the softening and stabilizing of oil prices and should increase their competitiveness. Brazil and Chindia are all oil producers with aggressive state-sponsored exploration and production efforts and strong economic growth prospect. Brazil, with a new and improved investment grade credit rating, is now largely self-sufficient and has insulated its economy from oil price shock on net basis.

The economic impact of oil prices on oil-importing, developing countries such as China and India could be more pronounced primarily because Chindia are more energy-intensive due to its strong growth rate, and less energy efficient. From that perspective, Chindia, though good prospects could be more of a roller-coaster ride for investors.

Among the emerging economies, lower crude oil prices will be a big dampener for Russian economy. Russia's two oil wealth funds declined by a total $1.54 billion over the last month, as more funds were transferred to aid federal budget shortfalls. The Reserve Fund, one of Russia’s two oil wealth funds, is expected to run out by the end of 2010.

Hat Tip: Professor Pinch
Economic Forecasts & Opinions

Falklands oil prospects stir Anglo-Argentinian tensions


Four British firms set to drill for oil north of Falkland Islands, in move Argentina calls a 'violation of sovereignty'

Stanley, on the Falkland Islands

Stanley, on the Falkland Islands. Photograph: Daniel Garcia/AFP/Getty Images

It does not look like much: a jumble of pipes, containers and drilling equipment sitting on a windswept jetty at Port Stanley.

The hardware, however, signals an imminent search for oil and gas that could turn the Falkland Islanders into south Atlantic oil barons, a prospect that has already triggered a dispute between Britain and Argentina.

A rig, the Ocean Guardian, is due to arrive by mid-February and will almost immediately begin drilling for hydrocarbon deposits 100 miles north of the archipelago.

Geological surveys suggest there could be up to 60bn barrels beneath the seabed around the British territory, a bonanza that would transform islands famed for sheep, fish and remoteness.

"The rig won't come into sight of Port Stanley unfortunately, it'll be out too far," said Phyll Rendell, the islands' director of mineral resources. "But everyone knows it's coming."

A British company, Desire Petroleum, has hired the rig to drill prospects in the North Falkland basin and will later lease it to two other British companies and an Australian one – Rockhopper, and Falklands Oil and Gas; and BHP Billiton – which also have exploration contracts. They will use the rig in rotation throughout 2010.

It will be the first drilling in Falkland waters since Shell suspended exploration in 1998 after oil prices slumped to $12 a barrel.

"With the rise in oil prices and the worldwide search for new oil and gas services, it has now become more than commercially viable for this work to begin," said Ben Romney, a Desire Petroleum spokesman. "We should know by the end of the year whether or not a major extraction programme will go ahead."

Argentina is not waiting that long to voice its anger. It lost the 1982 war with Britain over the islands, which it calls the Islas Malvinas, but still claims sovereignty and terms British control an occupation.

"What they are doing is illegitimate," said Jorge Taiana, the foreign minister. "It's a violation of our sovereignty. We will do everything possible to defend and preserve our rights."

Last week the government summoned Britain's chargé d'affaires – the ambassador was out of the country – to receive a protest note. Buenos Aires has reportedly warned Argentina-based oil companies against exploring waters around the Falklands and there are rumours it may use civilian vessels to disrupt the rig.

British diplomats brushed aside the protests and said it was longstanding UK policy to let the Falkland Islands government develop a hydrocarbons industry within its waters. They did not expect any Argentinian military forays.

Authorities on the islands were also unconcerned. "There will be quite a bit of rhetoric and Argentina has every right to protest if it wishes. But it will no doubt conduct itself in a proper manner," said Rendell. She was unaware of any plans by Buenos Aires to disrupt drilling.

Argentinians consider sovereignty over the islands a matter of national pride but few seemed impressed by their government's protest.

"Now the government is talking about the Malvinas again with their empty threats, and for what?" said Fabian Volonte, a former teenage conscript who was part of the 1982 invasion force. "We lost the war, now we have to watch the British growing rich from it and we can do nothing about it. It is just shame upon shame for Argentina."

Under current proposals the Falklands would receive 20% of all profits and 9% of royalties on every barrel. The four oil companies involved in drilling have also promised big onshore investment, including overhauling the main port and building 350 houses.

If even a small fraction of the potential deposits are found and extracted, it would transform the per capita income of the 2,900 islanders. Revenue from fisheries licences have in the last decade given Port Stanley, once desolate and broke, the feel of a prosperous Highland village.

The possibility of becoming a South Atlantic version of Brunei has not dazzled a population whose unofficial uniform is anorak and wellington boots.

Rather than the rig's imminent arrival, the local paper, the Penguin News, last week splashed on a proposal to market the Falklands to tourists as the "gateway to Antarctica".

"We have had the oil industry here before so there's a sense of been there, done that," said Rendell. "We have to remember that we haven't found any commercial oil yet. After six or seven months the drill could go away and not come back."

Argentina's claim

Argentina's anguish has sharpened with realisation it may have lost ­valuable natural resources in the South Atlantic as well as national pride. Argentina has claimed "Las Malvinas" since Britain occupied them in 1833, making the archipelago a source of national yearning for Argentinians. Losing the 73-day conflict in 1982 aggravated the sense of injustice. It has worsened since the islands began to thrive: fisheries ­licences generate millions of pounds, which could be dwarfed by oil and gas revenues. A scramble is under way off South America's Atlantic coast and the Antarctic. Argentina and Britain have extended claims over the continental shelf around the Falklands, and with Chile, Australia, New Zealand, France and Norway claim waters further south; Russia also says it reserves the right to make a claim. The Argentine president, Cristina Kirchner, has raised the prospect of Argentinian troops in the Antarctic to protect resources. Brazil, meanwhile, has posted troops in the Amazon and is beefing up its forces to protect oil and gas deposits 200 miles off its Atlantic coast.
Rory Carroll

• The articles above were amended on 8 February 2010. In the main story, BHP Billiton was originally described as a British company. In the second piece, China and Russia appeared on the list of current claimants. This has been corrected.

Mongolia Considers Keeping Ownership of Key Coal Asset

ULAN BATOR, Mongolia—Mongolian Prime Minister Batbold Sukhbaatar said he wants to keep full ownership of a key coal asset in government hands, potentially restricting access to a source that had drawn strong interest from Western mining companies.

Bloomberg News

'We must see how we can create favorable conditions for foreign investment,' Prime Minister Batbold Sukhbaatar said.on Monday confirmed his desire to

Speaking to reporters at the first Mongolia Economic Forum, Mr. Batbold said he favors keeping Tavan Tolgoi, a huge coking-coal deposit, under full government ownership. Ownership of key deposits other than Tavan Tolgoi would be decided on a "case-by-case basis," he said.

His comments confirmed speculation last week that the government was likely to back out of a plan to sell a 49% stake in Tavan Tolgoi, opting instead for mining contracts or production-sharing arrangements.

"Contract mining is widely used in the U.S. and Australia, so this should be useful to Mongolia. We must see how we can create favorable conditions for foreign investment," Mr. Batbold said.

The prime minister, who came into office in October last year, said his recommendation on Tavan Tolgoi was still under discussion. "A task force must still study the proposal and then make a recommendation to Parliament for endorsement," he said.

Besides Tavan Tolgoi, mineral-rich Mongolia has numerous other deposits that can be developed. The Mongolian government has so far identified 15 strategic deposits, of which it is prepared to own up to 51%.

Whatever arrangement Mongolia's government chooses to pursue has implications for mining companies keen to operate in the country, as well as for the government's own finances.

The government's plan to sell a stake in Tavan Tolgoi had attracted such bidders as Anglo-Australian company BHP Billiton, Brazil's Vale SA, Peabody Energy Corp. of the U.S., India's Jindal Group and China Shenhua Energy Co.

Under a production-sharing agreement, mining companies would bear the cost of developing the deposits and share revenue with the government. While the companies wouldn't own the deposits outright, the terms of an agreement can stretch 15 years or longer and can still be structured in a way that makes them attractive.

Under a contract-mining arrangement, the government itself would bear the cost of developing the project and hire an outside company to do the extraction work. Opting solely for contract mining on Tavan Tolgoi or other projects could be a challenge given the high costs involved and the weak finances of Mongolia's government.

"I don't think you have to extrapolate that it's a wholesale shift [in government policy]," said Alisher Ali Djumanov, chief executive of Eurasia Capital, an investment bank based in Hong Kong with a focus on frontier markets. "There are limits on how much the government can do. If they own 100% of Tavan Tolgoi, that will put the government in the driver's seat. It puts a lot of stress on the ministries. As other mining projects start up, there will be a limit on how many projects the government can handle simultaneously."

The Tavan Tolgoi mining deposit, located in Mongolia's South Gobi desert, has estimated coking-coal reserves of 6.5 billion metric tons and was originally developed with government funding.

Mongolia has some of the world's largest untapped reserves of coal, copper and other commodities.

Lawmakers are targeting US$10 billion to US$15 billion in new mining investment in the next five years, Ch. Khurelbaatar, a member of Parliament and head of Mongolia's standing committee on finance and budget, said late last year.

Interest in Mongolian mining assets has piqued the interest of potential investors since the government signed a landmark deal last year with Canada-based Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. to develop the US$4 billion Oyu Tolgoi mine project.

—Peter Stein contributed to this article.

Oil Royalty: Reality Or Political Manipulation

Syed Azwan Syed Ali

KUALA LUMPUR, Feb 9 (Bernama) -- The payment of RM20 million compassionate fund to Kelantan starting next month is manifestation of the federal government's wish not to marginalise people in the state.

The payment is five percent of gas produced since May 2008 at Medan Bumi Selatan in Block PM301 that is situated near the state's territorial waters

Although the block is not within Kelantan waters according to the Emergency Ordinance (Essential Powers) 1969, Kelantan people still benefit from the gas produced based on the spirit of the agreement between Petronas and the Kelantan government in 1975.

The question is whether the issue was raised to demand the people's right or just a political game to cover up other issues facing the Kelantan PAS government?

Political analysts said the oil royalty or compassionate fund had been twisted by certain quarters to meet their own interest.

"The real issue is the welfare of Kelantan people. Give them their dues if they have a right to it and vice versa," political observer Dr Sivamurugan Pandian told Bernama.

"Certain quarters had made confusing statements without looking at the issue as a whole," the Universiti Sains Malaysia (USM) political science lecturer said referring to the block in question.

Kelantan veteran Umno leader Tengku Razaleigh Hamzah, a former chairman of Petronas was reported saying that Kelantan had a right to oil royalty.

His statement on Jan 28 at Stadium Sultan Mohamed IV added to the confusion as Razaleigh was a signatory of the agreement between Petronas and the Kelantan government in 1975 under Act 144 (Petroleum Development Act 1974).

"Ku Li's statement not only gave PAS political mileage but was also confusing," Dr Sivamurugan said referring to Razaleigh's statement on Nov 1, 2000 that the Terengganu PAS government could not question the compassionate fund or oil royalty as it did not have rights.

Razaleigh also said that none of the states in peninsula had rights to oil royalty found outside their territories. On Feb 3, he denied making the statement in 2000.

Last year, the Kelantan government demanded royalty of RM2 billion oil royalty but the federal government said it did not qualify for royalty as two disputed oil wells are 150 nautical miles from its waters.

Section 4(2) of the Emergency Ordinance (Essential Powers) 1969 says that states in Malaysia have territorial waters up to three nautical miles (5.5 kilometres) measured from the water recede level.

Article 3 of the United Nations Convention On The Law of The Sea (Unclos) states that Malaysia's territorial waters is measured from the baselines until 12 nautical miles.

Article 57 states that the "beyond and adjacent" areas to Malaysian waters not more than 200 nautical miles from the baselines is the Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ).

This was why Malaysia and Thailand created the Malaysia-Thailand Joint Development Area (MTJDA) in 1979 to develop ovelapping areas covering 7,250 sq km in the Gulf of Siam and South China Sea and that the returns are to be equally divided.

PAS is aware that the provision makes royalty claim a non starter and that was why the opposition leader filed a motion to amend Act 144 in Dec last year to expand Kelantan's territory from three nautical miles to 200 nautical miles.

This reality was not explained to Kelantan people but was made a polemic and political capital which will not benefit anyone.

Despite this, International Trade and Industry Minister Datuk Mustapa Mohamed said the federal government had discussed with Petronas which agreed to pay RM20 million as compassionate fund to Kelantan people.

Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM) Assoc Prof Dr Ahmad Nidzamuddin Sulaiman said the RM20 million compassionate fund should be settled by both parties.

PAS had rejected the federal government's decision to channel the money via a special committee to ensure that it is not misused.

Kelantan Menteri Besar Datuk Nik Aziz Nik Mat assured that the money would not be misused if channeled to the state government, a sign of acceptance by the state government.

"Over time, the people of Kelantan will accept the rationale behind the compassionate fund," the political science lecturer said.

"What is important is that it benefits the people of Kelantan. The question of royalty or compassionate fund does not arise as the federal government has been fair based on the existing provisions," Dr Ahmad Nidzamuddin said.

-- BERNAMA

India building a security barrier against China

In a quest for military advantage along its border with China, India is intensifying its military cooperation with the United States and Russia and stepping up its military penetration of small border states adjoining China and India.

In the past decade India has bought arms worth US$50 billion from the United States, Russia, Britain, Israel and France, making it the biggest arms importer in the developing world. India has also held joint military exercises with the United States, and is developing close military ties with Moscow. In talks at the Kremlin last December, President Medvedev and Prime Minister Manmohan Singh agreed a blueprint for military cooperation to 2020, as well as a number of arms deals.

India has resumed military cooperation with Nepal, suspended in 2005. Under new agreements, India will train and share intelligence with Nepali forces. The Press Trust of India reported December 7, 2009 that India is to build an air base in Nepal and resume arms sales. The struggle between pro-India and pro-China forces in Nepal is at a critical stage and China needs to pay more attention to its interests there.

Following the 1962 Sino-Indian border war, India took control of and began to train the Bhutan Army. Over 4,000 Indian military advisors have been sent there. India helped establish and equip the Bhutan Air Force, which is deployed along the border with China, and has encouraged Russia to provide military helicopters and logistical support.

Myanmar, with 700 million barrels of oil reserves, 444.3 billion cubic meters of natural gas reserves, and a 2,185–kilometer long border with China, is also in the frame. Indian military officials began close contacts with the Myanmar government in 1997 and, since then, visits by successive Army Chiefs of Staff have become routine. India has been supplying military equipment to Burma since 1998.

In the Maldives, India has built radar installations and a base for early warning aircraft and helicopters.

But despite its arms purchases from the great powers and military penetration of neighboring countries, it remains extremely unlikely that India will unleash all-out conflict with China. Its pressing missions are to contain Pakistan and fight terrorism. Sino-Indian dialogue and negotiation mechanisms are still operating. For the foreseeable future, therefore, while a "cold war" between the two countries is increasingly likely, a "hot war" is out of the question.

The author is a columnist with China.org.cn For more information please visit:

http://www.china.org.cn/opinion/node_7078634.htm

China's CNOOC emerges from shadows, eyes big deal

HONG KONG
Mon Feb 8, 2010 7:31am EST

Stocks

CNOOC Limited
0883.HK
HK$11.52
+0.12+1.05%
6:11pm PST
CNOOC Limited
CEO.N
$145.34
-3.96-2.65%
12:00pm PST
Total S.A.
TOTF.PA
€40.89
+0.76+1.89%
12:00am PST

HONG KONG (Reuters) - China National Offshore Oil Corp's (0883.HK) likely acquisition of oil field assets in Africa should silence critics concerned that the country's top offshore oil producer has been sitting on too much cash for too long.

CNOOC (CEO.N) has been a noticeable absentee from overseas M&A since it paid $2.7 billion for a stake in French oil major Total's (TOTF.PA) African Akpo field in 2006. A year earlier, it was bumped by a U.S. political backlash from buying U.S.-based oil company Unocal.

Analysts had begun to question the group's bullish production growth forecasts, pushing CNOOC to seek more outbound deals.

The Chinese group may now be about to pay up to $2.5 billion for Ugandan assets owned by Heritage Oil Plc (HOIL.L).

"This deal makes a lot of sense in the longer term," said Gordon Kwan, head of regional energy research at Mirae Asset Securities. "Acquisitions are the fastest way for a company to grow its production and reserves, while not every exploration effort will result in new discoveries."

"Now's the best time to come back to the market, with oil prices down 50 percent from an all-time high," Kwan said, noting that if CNOOC were to pay $2.5 billion for a 20 percent stake, it would be getting 164 million barrels at $15 per barrel.

"It's not unreasonable," he said.

The sale process for the oil fields, which executives say contain around 2 billion barrels of oil, has been a competitive process between British, Italian and Chinese oil majors.

On Friday, Italy's Eni SpA (ENI.MI) pulled out of a planned $1.5 billion purchase of Heritage Oil's 50 percent share of Ugandan Blocks 1 and 3A -- in which London-listed Tullow Oil Plc (TLW.L) has preemption rights.

Tullow and Heritage control three oil blocks that cover the Ugandan side of Lake Albert, but the explorers lack the resources to develop the project alone.

Tullow has said it wants to sell the Heritage assets on to CNOOC. A Dow Jones report on Friday said CNOOC was preparing a statement about a $2.5 billion deal with Tullow.

Heritage Oil said on Monday it will receive $1.35 billion on completion of the sale of its Ugandan assets.

"These assets are in offshore development, which clearly CNOOC has expertise in," said Neil Beveridge, senior oil analyst at Sanford Bernstein, adding that CNOOC's ability to attract capital when needed would work in the Chinese firm's favor.

"CNOOC has a very low gearing and the ability to call on lending for Chinese banks probably at attractive interest rates," Beveridge said. "This should enable CNOOC to pull off this deal without any problems."

CNOOC spokesman Jiang Yongzhi declined to comment.

AFRICAN DREAMS

China's oil and gas companies have announced roughly $18.8 billion in outbound acquisitions this year, according to Thomson Reuters data.

Last year, CNOOC was in the running to buy the prized Jubilee oil field stake in Ghana, owned by Kosmos Energy, which is backed by private equity giants Blackstone (BX.N) and Warburg Pincus.

In September, CNOOC identified 23 licenses in Nigeria in which it would like to buy stakes, including 16 operated by Royal Dutch Shell (RDSa.L), Chevron (CVX.N) and Exxon Mobil (XOM.N) which were up for renewal.

Nigerian politicians are even pumping up a potential deal.

"The application was to acquire reserves of 6 billion barrels which we are currently discussing. They are prepared to spend as much as $50 billion," Emmanuel Egbogah, Nigeria's presidential adviser on energy, said in December.

CNOOC said last week it aims to produce 275-290 million barrels of oil and gas equivalent (boe) this year, up from an estimated 226-228 million boe in 2009.

That 21-28 percent increase would represent a higher annual growth target than international oil majors BP Plc (BP.L) and Shell, which have scaled back targets amid falling oil prices.

(Additional reporting by Chen Aizhu in BEIJING)

Chinese oil companies invest heavily abroad

Chinese oil and gas companies have boosted their investments abroad since 2008 despite the global economic downturn, having committed billions of dollars into developing large fields in the Middle East and elsewhere.

"Looking ahead, the Chinese oil and gas companies will undoubtedly continue their aggressive investments in oversea oil and gas assets, either through corporate acquisitions or bidding rounds," said a January brief from FACTS Global Energy, based in Singapore.

Liutong Zhang and Kang Wu wrote the brief entitled "China's Overseas Oil and Gas Investment."

They said China's equity (net) oil production from its overseas operations in 2008 was 900,000 b/d. Although less that half of that actually reached China, the overseas production volume accounted for 25% of China's total crude oil imports, 23% of domestic oil production, and 12.5% of oil consumption.

Chinese companies' net oil production abroad is expected to reach 1.2 million b/d this year. The FACTS analysts forecast China's net overseas oil production at 1.7 million b/d by 2015 and 2 million b/d by 2020.

"With a flat domestic production, by 2020 the overseas equity oil could account [for] half of China's domestic oil production," they said.

CNPC abroad

China National Petroleum Corp. is the biggest investor among Chinese companies since late 2008. CNPC and its subsidiary, PetroChina Co. Ltd., currently are involved in more than 90 overseas projects, of which 65 involve oil or gas production and development.

Their 2008 net oil production from production outside China was 612,000 b/d of oil and 450 MMscfd of gas.

CNPC also has invested to build pipelines to import oil and gas from overseas, and it moved toward its goal of becoming an international company by buying Singapore Petroleum Co. (see Table 1).

The company and its subsidiaries hold stakes in oil and gas assets in 27 countries and provide field services, engineering, and construction in 49 countries worldwide.

CNPC-PetroChina concentrated their overseas investments in Africa, central Asia, Latin America, and the Middle East.

China National Offshore Oil Corp. (CNOOC) follows CNPC-PetroChina in its overseas investment while China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. (Sinopec) is third among Chinese companies in its international holdings.

In addition, state oil trading company Sinochem Group has begun investing abroad. Separately, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange and China Investment Corp. (CIC) also are acquiring interests in overseas ventures.

"There is no doubt that CNPC-Petrochina, CNOOC, Sinopec, and Sinochem have become important players in the global merger and acquisition market," FACTS said. "Nonetheless, the Chinese oil companies suffered a series of setbacks in 2009."

The Libyan government blocked CNPC International Ltd.'s proposed $499 million (Can.) takeover of Verenex Energy Inc. of Calgary. Instead, the Libyan Investment Authority, a sovereign wealth fund, acquired Verenex for $316 million (Can.).

Elsewhere, Angola's Sonangol reportedly moved to block Sinopec and CNOOC from obtaining deepwater acreage, FACTS analysts said.

Diverse investments

China's oil and gas companies, particularly CNPC-PetroChina, have signed several preliminary agreements and memorandums of understanding outlining billions of dollars in future investments (see Table 2).

CNPC is heavily involved in Iran and Iraq. FACTS attributed CNPC's ability to invest in Iran to the US sanctions keeping US-based oil companies away from investing there.

On Jan. 14, 2009, CNPC signed a buyback binding contract with National Iranian Oil Co. (NIOC) to develop onshore North Azadegan oil field. Duration of the agreement is 25 years. CNPC also has an MOU with NIOC to develop South Azadegan oil field.

Under the MOU, CNPC will take a 70% interest in South Azadegan while NIOC keeps a 20% share and Japan's Inpex owns 10%.

FACTS said the project reportedly will need up to $2.5 billion worth of investments, of which CNPC is expected to pay $2.25 billion and Inpex is to pay the rest.

"If the deal is successfully concluded, it will consolidate CNPC's interest in developing the Azadegan structure," FACTS said. "Azadegan is Iran's largest oil discovery in 30 years with estimated reserves of more than 30 million bbl."

Azadegan is close to the Iraqi border and has a complex geological formation, making the project both a strategic priority and an enormous technical challenge for Iran, FACTS said.

CNPC-PetroChina, already heavily involved in Kazakhstan and Turkmenistan, is looking to invest more in Russia, both in upstream and in pipelines.

In October 2008, CNPC and Transneft agreed to build a 300,000-b/d oil pipeline from East Siberia to China. On Apr. 27, 2009, Transneft launched construction of an offshore section from the East Siberia-Pacific Ocean to the Chinese border, just under 43½ miles. CNPC will build the remaining 609-mile stretch of pipeline.

Although not officially confirmed by the companies, FACTS said the estimated cost of the pipeline is $800 million.

Russia and China also plan cooperative gas pipeline projects. FACTS analysts said Russia reportedly reached an initial agreement in 2009 to supply China 6.76 bscfd, "which seems on the high end, given the capacity of the planned gas pipeline," adding, "It is expected that the gas fields in Siberia could be put into operation after 2015."

Chinese loans

The China Development Bank (CDB) last year signed a long-term agreement with CNPC in which CDB loaned CNPC $30 billion during 5 years to accelerate CNPC's globalization strategy of being an international operator in both upstream and downstream, FACTS said.

In addition to buying assets, China has offered $57 billion total in loans to several producing countries. China introduced the concept of loans for oil in 2004 by providing Angola with a $4 billion oil-backed loan for energy, infrastructure, and other projects.

Subsequently, China made a series of loans to Angola, which exports about 40% of its crude production to China.

China also has made loans to companies in Venezuela, Russia, Kazakhstan, Brazil, Turkmenistan, Bolivia, and Ecuador in exchange for long-term oil and gas supplies.

"Those countries could repay the loan through revenues from oil sales by selling upstream assets to Chinese oil and gas companies or through supplying crudes to China," FACTS said. "It is very likely that Chinese leaders will be able to negotiate a good return on their investment in future loans for oil and gas deals."

China also is building goodwill by providing capital to producing countries, analysts said.

The motivation for Chinese oil and gas companies to expand abroad is to take advantage of the Chinese government's concerns about security of energy supply, FACTS said. "Though the Chinese government actively encouraged overseas investment in the past, CNPC-PetroChina, Sinopec, CNOOC, and Sinochem are taking the lead today," FACTS said.

Other Chinese companies are interested in making overseas oil and gas investments, FACTS said, adding these smaller companies include ZhenHua Oil Co. and China Aviation Oil.

In late 2009, Shaanxi Yanchang Petroleum signed a production-sharing contract with New Energy Chemical Investment Group of Thailand to explore and develop gas Block L31/50, covering 3,960 sq km.

Yanchang Petroleum also has a production-sharing contract with Cameroon's government to explore the Zina and Makari blocks, which cover 3,862 sq km and 4,644 sq km, respectively. Yanchang Petroleum plans to spend $60 million during a 7-year exploration period, FACTS said.

Costa Rica, China eye USD 1 billion refinery deal

Costa Rica and China's top state oil company CNPC are hammering out the details of a planned refinery upgrade that could cost up to USD 1 billion, the head of Costa Rica's national oil company said.

The project, which would triple the size of the Central American nation's only oil refinery by 2015, is likely to be approved by the two companies sometime in 2011 after further engineering studies are completed, Jose Desanti, the head of Costa Rican state oil refiner Recope, said on Friday.

"We're just a few weeks from bringing (the joint venture) to life," Desanti told Reuters in an interview. "We think it will be 14 to 18 months to give the green light to start the project," he added.

The deal with CNPC evolved out of conversations between the two companies when Costa Rica dropped its diplomatic recognition of Taiwan in favour of China in 2007.

In return for the switch, Beijing has already made low interest loans to the Central American nation and is building a soccer stadium in the capital San Jose.

Chinese oil companies have been expanding in the Americas as they seek to build up global businesses and secure new sources of supply for China's rapidly growing economy. CNPC has a long-standing interest in Venezuela and most recently Petrochina, a subsidiary of CNPC, took over a strategic oil storage terminal lease in the Netherlands Antilles.

However, China's entry into Costa Rica's energy sector is unlikely to provide it with access to new reserves for the foreseeable future as public opinion in the environmentally conscious nation is strongly opposed to oil drilling.

Joint Venture

Recope, which is Costa Rica's monopoly oil refiner and distributor, has wanted to expand its existing 20,000 barrels per day refinery for some time to reduce its reliance on oil product imports, but has lacked the financial strength to do so on its own alongside other projects.

The refinery upgrade will be carried out by a 50-50 joint venture between Recope and CNPC that will then lease the plant back to Recope upon completion. The two sides hope to finance 70% of the cost of the upgrade.

"From feasibility studies, we estimate a range of USD 800 million to USD 1 billion," said Desanti.

Financing from the project is likely to be provided in part by China at "attractive terms," he added.

The expansion plan comes as global refining margins have fallen sharply, forcing the closure of several refineries in the United States and elsewhere. Recope is confident refining margins will recover in the medium term, Desanti said.

Recope is also working on a modernization of its terminal facilities in the Caribbean to allow it to receive tankers capable of carrying up to 80,000 tonnes of refined products.

A new crude oil loading monobuoy is also being studied.

Synthesis Energy Systems Receives Approval for the Expansion of Hai Hua Gasification Plant

Phase II Expansion to Include Production of Monoethylene Glycol

HOUSTON and SHANGHAI, Feb. 8 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- Synthesis Energy Systems, Inc. ("SES") (Nasdaq: SYMX), a global energy and gasification technology company, announced that it has received the required Shandong Provincial Government approval for the Phase II expansion of the Company's Hai Hua plant located in Zaozhuang City, Shandong Province, China. This approval will allow SES to expand its current facilities to include production of approximately 50K tpa of monoethylene glycol ("Glycol") and associated by-products. The approval describes certain details of the expansion project including but not limited to its use of land, the main additional facilities required and the utilization of the existing facilities and syngas product for the expansion.

"We are extremely pleased with our U-GAS® technology's performance at Hai Hua and our ability to demonstrate operational success. Now we are seeing an opportunity to optimize the asset and create additional value through a Phase II expansion of the plant," said Robert Rigdon, President and CEO. "As we have mentioned previously, we have been investigating this possibility for the past several months and although we have not yet made a definitive decision to move forward, this approval advances the likelihood of such an expansion significantly," Rigdon added.

SES believes the Phase II expansion will strengthen the financial performance of the Phase I assets and does not believe additional equity will be required from SES for the expansion. SES is currently engaged with parties who are interested in becoming a partner in the Phase II expansion. SES expects the additional capital required for the expansion to be provided by new partners while SES will contribute a portion of its current 95% equity stake in Phase I towards the expanded plant.

Additionally, the government has expressed support for the expansion project and SES received a letter of intent in July 2009 from the local Xue Cheng government which describes their intent to allow a new local coal mine to be used as the debt guarantee for the expansion project.

Today China imports about 70% of its Glycol, which is an important raw material used in a wide variety of products and applications, including the manufacture of polyester fibers in the textile industry, special resins, antifreeze formulations and other industrial products. Glycol price largely tracks crude oil price as it is normally derived from ethylene which is produced from crude oil derivatives such as naphtha.

The southern Shandong region is a strategic location with abundant coal resources and positioned in the heart of China's rapidly growing chemical production base. Expansion of the plant was part of the earlier initial project conception and a separate approval was received in August 2008 for a Phase II expansion which contemplated an additional production capacity of approximately 17,000 standard cubic meters per hour ("scm/hr") (a 15 MW equivalent) of high grade syngas. However, after completing a feasibility study last year, using a certified Chinese Design Institute, SES elected not to proceed with the additional syngas capacity approach and instead decided to explore the monoethylene glycol opportunity.

About Synthesis Energy Systems, Inc.

SES is an energy and technology company that builds, owns and operates coal gasification plants that utilize its proprietary U-GAS® fluidized bed gasification technology to convert low rank coal and coal wastes into higher value energy products, such as transportation fuel and ammonia. The U-GAS® technology, which SES licenses from the Gas Technology Institute, gasifies coal without many of the harmful emissions normally associated with coal combustion plants. The primary advantages of U-GAS® relative to other gasification technologies are (a) greater fuel flexibility provided by our ability to use all ranks of coal (including low rank, high ash and high moisture coals, which are significantly cheaper than higher grade coals), many coal waste products and biomass feed stocks; and (b) our ability to operate efficiently on a smaller scale, which enables us to construct plants more quickly, at a lower capital cost, and, in many cases, in closer proximity to coal sources. SES currently has offices in Houston, Texas and Shanghai, China. For more information on SES, visit www.synthesisenergy.com or call (713) 579-0600.

Power company denies coal deal with Australian firm

BEIJING: China Power International Development Ltd. (CPI), a unit of major power producer China Power Investment Corp., Monday denied media reports that it had signed a 60-billion US dollar coal-supply deal with Australia's mining firm Resourcehouse.

What the two companies had signed was an agreement of intent, and they had not yet started price negotiations, an official from China Power International Development told Xinhua.

Related readings:
Power company denies coal deal with Australian firm $60bn Aussie coal deal inked
Power company denies coal deal with Australian firm Australian firm secures coal export deal with China
Power company denies coal deal with Australian firm China to set coal industry access system
Power company denies coal deal with Australian firm Coal mine accidents, fatalities drop in 2009

Resourcehouse, the Australian coal and iron-ore project developer planning a Hong Kong listing next month, claimed on Saturday that it had signed the massive deal with CPI, according to which Resourcehouse would supply 30 million tonnes of coal annually to CPI over next 20 years.

The CPI official, who did not want to be named, said the sum of $60 billion was an estimation by Resourcehouse, which was revealed by the Australian company probably for its own benefits.

Resourcehouse chairman Clive Palmer reportedly said the coal of the "Australia's biggest ever export contract" would come from a coal mine project in Queensland known as China First, which was to be built by Metallurgical Corporation of China Limited, one of the world's biggest engineering contractors.

The China First project, costing $7 billion, would be constructed this year and become operational in 2013.

Currently 70 percent of China's primary energy generation comes from coal. China imported 43.9 million tonnes of coal from Australia in 2009, which made it the largest coal exporter to China, according to the National Bureau of Statistics.

China National Petroleum Construct Pipeline in Middle East

China National Petroleum Corp. has begun construction of a pipeline across neighboring Burma to speed delivery of Middle East oilshipped through the Indian Ocean.

Construction of the 771 kilometer (481 mile) pipeline comes as China boosts investment in Burma and tries to gain greater access to foreign oil and gas supplies to fuel its booming economy.

The pipeline will connect Burma’s port of Maday Island on the Indian Ocean via Mandalay in central Burma to Ruili in China’s southwestern province of Yunnan, CNPC said on its Web site. It gave no indication when the pipeline would be ready for use but said it will be capable of carrying 84 million barrels of oil per year.

The pipeline would speed delivery of Middle East oil to China and eliminate the need for tankers to pass through the crowded Malacca Strait between Malaysia and Indonesia.

China is Burma’s biggest foreign investor and the closest ally of its military regime, which is shunned by the West because of its poor human rights record and failure to hand over power to a democratically elected government.

Critics complain that oil and gas projects in Burma are helping to keep the military in power and could harm the environment and local residents.

“Past experience has shown that pipeline construction and maintenance in Burma involves forced labor, forced relocation, land confiscations and a host of abuses by soldiers,” said a group based in Thailand, the Shwe Gas Movement, in a report this year.

CNPC owns PetroChina Ltd, Asia’s biggest oil and gas producer by volume.

CNPC and another Chinese state-owned oil producer, China National Offshore Oil Co., have exploration projects of oil in Burma and are expected to be key customers for natural gas from a newly developed offshore field.

China also has built an oil pipeline connecting its northwest with fields in Kazakhstan in Central Asia and is constructing another pipeline to obtain crude from Russian fields in Siberia.

Your Own Private Hydrogen Power Station

Vietnam To Privatize National Petroleum Corp

HANOI -(Dow Jones)- The Ministry of Industry and Trade said Monday that it has decided to privatize Vietnam National Petroleum Corp., or Petrolimex.

The government will retain a stake of at least 75% in the company when it is privatized, the ministry said.

The decision comes a month after Prime Minister Nguyen Tan Dung said he agreed in principle to privatize the company.

Petrolimex, which holds a 60% share of Vietnam's retail oil products market, said last week that it aims to complete its privatization process this year.

PetroVietnam to boost cooperation with Sudan’s oil giant

A delegation from the Sudan National Petroleum Corporation (SUDAPET), led by its CEO Salah Wahbi Hassan, has arrived for a visit to Vietnam to further promote the cooperation with the Vietnam National Oil and Gas Group (PetroVietnam).

At the delegation’s reception in Hanoi on February 8, State Vice President Nguyen Thi Doan confirmed the state’s support for cooperation between the two groups and hoped the African nation will create favourable conditions for PetroVietnam to invest on its territories.

Mrs. Doan added that the cooperation between SUDAPET and PetroVietnam will help strengthen the traditional friendship between the two countries.

CEO Hassan thanked Vietnam for supporting Sudan in recent years, particularly after the former was a non-permanent member of the United Nations Security Council.

He expressed his belief that Vietnam will fulfill its mission as ASEAN Chair in 2010.

Iran’s recent statements about production of fuel for the Tehran Research Reactor: A quick review

ISIS Reports

by David Albright and Jacqueline Shire

February 8, 2010

Iran announced Sunday, February 7, that President Ahmadinejad had instructed the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran to “start production of 20 percent enriched uranium if talks on swap deal (sic) fail.” (IRNA report here; the swap deal refers to a plan under which Iran would relinquish some 1200 kg of its accumulated low enriched uranium (LEU) from Natanz in exchange for fuel for the Tehran Research Reactor, a 5 MW-thermal reactor that is expected to run out of fuel within the year).

Later in the day, Ali Akbar Salehi, the head of the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran, was quoted saying on Iran’s Arabic-language state television channel, al Alam: “We will hand over an official letter to the IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency) tomorrow [Monday], informing the agency that we will start making 20 percent enriched fuel from Tuesday.” Whether Iran has already prepared the Natanz Fuel Enrichment Plant to actually enrich uranium to this level is unknown.

Salehi also told al Alam that “Iran will set up 10 uranium enrichment centres next year.” The Iranian year begins on March 21.

ISIS described here in a technical note the fueling requirements of the TRR. In short, if operated at its capacity of 5 MW-th per year, it would require between 9.2 and 18.4 kg LEU (uranium mass) annually. If operated at lower output, as have been its history, it would require between 5.5 to 11 kg of LEU (uranium mass) per year.

A timeline describing the history of the TRR can be found here.

Can Iran produce 20 percent-enriched uranium?

Yes. Though Iran may encounter some challenges, it is technically equipped to produce 19.75 percent enriched uranium at the Natanz Fuel Enrichment Plant (note, any uranium enriched to under 20 percent U-235 is classified by the IAEA as LEU; uranium enriched to 20 percent or greater is classified as high enriched uranium (HEU).

Iran has not stated how it intends to produce this enriched uranium at Natanz. A likely scenario would involve dedicating an existing module for the production of the 19.75 percent LEU with some modification at feed and withdrawal points to handle smaller canisters of material. It is worth noting that approximately half of Iran’s 8,000 installed centrifuges are not currently operating and could be dedicated to this effort.

In operating its cascades to produce the 19.75 percent LEU, Iran would have to take special care to prevent the concentration of impurities including air, water vapor, and volatile gases which can build as the enrichment level goes higher. Iran has already had some experience addressing these issues with its existing enrichment effort.

It is difficult to determine if Iran could start producing 19.75 percent enriched uranium on Tuesday. The IAEA has not confirmed any of Iran’s statements as of early Monday morning. If it were to start on Tuesday, Iran would have had to already accomplish several preliminary steps at Natanz, perhaps without notifying the IAEA. However, Iran is likely to use 3.5 percent enriched uranium as feed into the cascades to make 19.75 percent enriched uranium, and Iran would have to notify the IAEA about moving this LEU feed and starting the actual enrichment process.

How much of its existing LEU will it use for TRR fuel?

As of November 2009, Iran had accumulated over 1800 kg of LEU enriched to approximately 3.5 percent (when the next IAEA report is released later this month, it is likely that Iran will have surpassed 2,000 kg of LEU). But Iran needs to use only a small fraction, about 200 kilograms of 3.5 percent enriched uranium, to make 20 kilograms of 19.75 percent enriched uranium, more than enough to fuel the TRR each year.

If Iran were to allocate 1,200 kg of LEU, as proposed in the swap arrangement, Iran could produce approximately 120 kilograms of 19.75 LEU (uranium mass), assuming a tails assay of 0.71 percent (natural uranium). This quantity of fuel would correspond to roughly 6-13 years worth of fuel at an operating power of 5 MW-th and a capacity factor between 40 and 80 percent, assuming some minimal losses in fuel fabrication. If the TRR remains at 3 MW-th, this would be sufficient fuel for 11 to 21 years of operation.

If Iran were to use its entire stockpile of accumulated LEU in the effort, it would be going most of the remaining way toward the production of weapon-grade HEU. Producing 3.5 percent enriched uranium is about 70 percent of the way to weapon-grade uranium in terms of enrichment efforts. If this is the case, Iran would require only a small enrichment capability of between 500-1,000 P1 centrifuges, assuming significant inefficiencies in its centrifuges, to produce sufficient weapon-grade material in a breakout scenario in six months. Such a facility would be extremely hard for the IAEA or intelligence services to detect.

An Iranian decision to dedicate its entire LEU stockpile to the production of 19.75 percent LEU is likely to raise significant alarm in the international community about Iran’s intentions.

Can Iran fabricate the necessary fuel rods for the reactor?

Yes, but not without some challenges to overcome. Currently, the fuel for this type of reactor is made by France and Argentina, and in small quantities by a few other countries, including Chile. Argentina was the last supplier to Iran. Iran has never fabricated this type of fuel and would require some time to master the process.

Iran will likely use knowledge gained from abroad to make the fuel. But Iran will need to do so without jeopardizing the reactor’s safety. Normally, a safety authority would want new fuel tested for an extended period of time, before allowing it to be used routinely in a reactor. Otherwise, the chance of an accident could increase. Iran may choose to skip this step, since it may not have enough fuel left to allow for prolonged testing of the new fuel. However, issues of the fuel’s quality assurance and ultimately reactor safety would give most nations pause about heading down this path.

Can Iran build ten enrichment plants?

No, Iran cannot build ten enrichment plants anytime soon. It can certainly break ground for ten, but outfitting them with centrifuge equipment is far-fetched, and we doubt this is the motivation for the announcement. Iran may seek to project defiance, strength, and technical prowess, despite deficits in all but the first. A subtler point is that Iran may be signaling that it is building other centrifuge plants that it has no intention of declaring early, unless one is discovered by foreign intelligence. Iran is capable of installing several thousand P1 or more advanced centrifuges at one or two other sites, each having enough centrifuges to produce weapon-grade uranium from natural uranium. A new site could be built secretly and be hard to identify against the growing noise from all of Iran’s centrifuge activities. Iran appears to be doing due diligence against what it likely fears is an impending military strike, following which it could push rapidly for nuclear weapons. Alternatively, Iran may decide to build nuclear weapons and want facilities able to survive subsequent, almost assured military strikes. There is a cost to this strategy of building multiple enrichment plants simultaneously, in addition to Natanz and Fordow, in particular stretching thin Iran’s still meager centrifuge expertise.

Monday, February 8, 2010

How dry I am

How Dry I Am (And Maybe A Little Hungry Too) – Last year, I suggested that 2010 might be the year of food shortages around the globe. That may be why I was struck by a piece put out by the always sharp-eyed, Andy Lees, of UBS in London. Andy reviewed a treatise on global water put out by the World Economic Forum (pronounced “Davos”). The figures Andy pulled from the report are downright stunning. Here’s how Andy began:

Water – The global growth inhibitor!!!

http://www.weforum.org/pdf/water/WaterInitiativeFutureWaterNeeds.pdf, written by the World Economic Forum, and entitled “The Bubble is Close to Bursting”, gives some pretty hard facts about water security that mean present day assumptions about economic trends seem unlikely to bear any reality to what transpires. It does talk about long term affects from global warming, but given that is all theory, I want to concentrate on just the hard facts as we know them.

70% of global freshwater withdrawals are used for agriculture – (up to 90% in developing economies), but it is thought that 50% of that water is wasted against the most efficient irrigation systems. A typical meat eater’s diet requires twice the water input than a vegetarian diet of similar nutritional value – (meat itself requires 10 times the water per calorie than plants), so a simple switch to meat would wipe out all the possible efficiency gains from drip irrigation etc, before accounting for the 2bn – 3bn (30% - 45%) growth in population numbers expected over the next 25 – 40 years. There simply isn’t the water for the world at large to go on the Atkins diet. “With business as usual water use practices, by 2025, water scarcity could affect annual global crop yield to the equivalent of losing the entire grain crops of India and the US combined (30% of global cereal consumption”.

Andy then went on to point out that if we tried to increase energy supplies by 5% using something like Ethanol, it would double the global agricultural demand for water. Andy then goes on to compare water usage to GDP.

Not only does China use 10 times the energy per unit of GDP than does Japan, but it uses 5 times the water per unit of GDP than the world on average, and 8 times the water per unit of GDP than the US. There simply are not the resources available to lift China’s GDP per capita to the levels of the West. Of China’s 669 cities, 60% suffer water shortages and half of them lack wastewater treatment. Treating sewage – (pumping) – requires large amounts of energy that China cannot afford. The global market for water and sanitation infrastructure is estimated to grow from USD400bn a year today. By 2015 an average annual investment of USD772bn will be required for water and wastewater services around the world.

We’ll have more on China in a minute but the WEF paper on water may well be worth a weekend read. Not only will water shortages become a drag on the global economy, it may be the cause of conflict both among nations and within them. It will also be a great investment opportunity.


Report: Israeli warships on way to Persian Gulf

Sun, 07 Feb 2010 07:48:11 GMT
Font size :
As Israel keeps threatening the regional countries with war, Egyptian maritime sources say the Israeli navy has deployed two missile ships to the Persian Gulf.

Citing the sources, Yediot Ahronot reported Saturday that two Israeli missile ships passed through the Suez Canal en rout to the Red Sea on Thursday morning.

The sources said the ships are expected to reach the Persian Gulf within the next four days.

According to the report, Cairo adopted tight security measures to ensure the safe passage of the Israeli ships through the canal.

The waterway, which had not previously been used by Israeli vessels for intelligence reasons, was traversed for the first time in June 2009 when a Dolphin-class submarine (a nuclear German-made submarine) reportedly sailed from the Mediterranean to reach military exercises in the Red Sea.